Pure Web3: Framework (Part 12.1)

You are currently viewing Pure Web3: Framework (Part 12.1)

Pure Web3 Outline

The Pure Web3 sub-series will be released in multiple parts for easier comprehension. The following figure outlines the series’ structure, showing which sections are already covered, currently being covered, and coming soon.

Figure 0. Pure Web3 Sub-Series Outline.

Web3 Framework

To move beyond simplistic categorizations, we introduce a practical evaluation framework (detailed in Figure 1) designed to systematically assess where a project falls along the Web1-to-Web3 spectrum. Unlike the conventional “read-write-own” model, this functional framework provides a more nuanced set of criteria to measure alignment with core Web3 principles.

Figure 1. Functional Framework: Web1-Web2-Web3.

This model is deeply rooted in the vision of Web3 articulated by Dr. Gavin Wood; the one emphasizing decentralization, user sovereignty, and trust-minimized infrastructure. It serves not as a rigid taxonomy, but as a diagnostic tool to evaluate projects based on their architectural and economic design.

Information

The evolution of information online mirrors the broader transition from Web1 to Web3. Under Web1, information was largely unstructured and decentralized in publication – static pages built on diverse, often incompatible frameworks resulted in a vast but disorganized digital landscape. Data existed, but without uniform standards or machine-readable context, its utility was limited.

Web2 introduced order through centralization. Content Management Systems (CMS) enabled effortless website creation, while platforms like Facebook consolidated user interaction within walled gardens. However, the true architect of Web2’s information layer was Google. Its search algorithms forced the web into uniformity by rewarding SEO-friendly, tagged, and indexed content. To be visible was to be compliant; Web1’s asynchronous and independent nature was effectively marginalized.

Even modern AI, often misperceived as revolutionary, operates within a Web2 paradigm – processing data within centralized silos, often without user control or transparency.

Web3 reintroduces uniformity but through open protocols, not corporate enforcement. From torrent files to Bitcoin transactions, data follows shared, open standards that enable interoperability and user control. However, Web3 remains a nascent layer, accounting for only a small portion of today’s internet. The majority remains under Web2’s influence, while Web1’s maximalist, self-hosted ethos persists in corners of the digital world.

Figure 2. Information Architecture Across Web Eras.

Disclaimer

The materials presented in this article are for informational purposes only and are not investment advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute an adviser-client relationship. GHOST is not a registered investment advisor or advisory service. It does not tell or suggest which securities should be bought or sold. The analysts and employees or affiliates of GHOST may hold positions in digital assets discussed here. There is a very high degree of risk involved in digital asset investment. You should always check with your licensed financial advisor and tax advisor to determine the suitability of any investment. No assumption should be made in relation to the performance or accuracy of the methods shown. No claims are made as to the success or profitability of any of this content.